(August 25, 2018 at 3:55 am)negatio Wrote:(August 25, 2018 at 3:41 am)Losty Wrote: It looks like your quoting skills have improved, congrats on that. If you need any more help let me know. I usually fix people’s misquotes but I have been lazy in this thread, so sorry for that. I don’t mind sending you screenshots and detailed descriptions on quoting. I know it seems trivial but it really does matter to a lot of people that we can tell who said what. Anyway, thanks for working on it.
Wow, thanks man. I want to comprehend this stuff so that I can move forward with theoretical considerations. If you could help me out that would be wonderful, but it has to be done in some special was or other, because when I look at computer code it is totally meaningless and unintelligible to me ! Thanks a million. Negatio.
(August 25, 2018 at 3:44 am)Khemikal Wrote: Saying this over and over won't make it any more true than it was the first time. As I said, your argument is incapable of dealing with a brute fact. This is a flaw to be fixed, not a hill to die defending.I am absolutely failing to comprehend what you mean by your contention that my position cannot deal with whatever the hell a "brute fact" is. Have you ever seen a 'fact', a unicorn ? I am pretty sure I could deal with your brute. Describe it to me dude.
Don't mean to be negative here but the quoting was only a minor issue. The major issue is the communication barrier that exists for readers reading your OP. So looks like someone is gonna need to teach you effective communication next. Well done to whoever taught you quoting.
