Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

If you want your position to survive for centuries to come do you plan on publishing and/or peer review?

Ha ! Dreamer ! Yes, publishing seems an ideal possibility, however, I am not even sure if people read printed works anymore. At this point, to act in pursuit of the possibility of publication would be a radically difficult objective for me to attain, I only have a B.A., which may not give me sufficient credence in the world of publication. Online is good for now. I wanted to cast my writing out into the world; now, I have, via the internet; and, a certain process has perhaps begun, i.e., that process wherein a person submits a theoretical work to the world, and, then, goes through a series of paradigm stages, which I do not clearly recall at the moment, wherein, at first, his theory is absolutely scorned and rejected as absurd and unworthy nonsense; then, it is seen to be radically acceptable the world; then, the persons who originally maintained the absurdity of the theory, claim it as their own !

---

What fundamental religious beliefs are you destructing?

Jehovah's mistaken notion that he could efficiently/successfully reign as God, over men,by positing a series of laws, which, he mistakenly thought, would function either to determine man's conduct directly, via the word,or, move men to determine themselves, by law, to act in accordance with law. When, in fact, human conduct does not originate on the basis of given states of affairs like a language of law.

---

No, you make my position clear to yourself by yourself.  I cannot possibly do it for you. I have given my position and, then totally rewritten part of it for the members.  I am writing as clearly as I, as a radically limited human being, at this moment, can.  What I say, even at what appears to be the thickest, hardest, most unbearable juncture thereof, is insightfully crystal clear; totally translucent; ---- some of it is even absolutely original thinking. I have studied radically intently as an ideaologist...I successful wrote my way to a degree in philosophy with straight A's for teachers who stressed and demanded, clarity.  I can do clarity, I do clarity. Now, this is not college. What I am playing here is hardball.  I am undertaking a philosophical/theoretical destruction of our most fundamental religious beliefs, and, of the legalistic foundations of America itself.  My position is cast in a manner fit to survive the most possible insightful attack against it which might happen to be brought against it for centuries to come; for there will be those, like Jormungander,who can,and will,undertake to defeat it.  The OP is written to withstand the slings and arrows of future bright minds, for as long as possible.  The OP is enunciating a radical vision for the future; based upon the most difficult and powerful thought of the past, as exampled by Spinoza; Hegel; Sartre...it is not my thought that is, for the most part, is being presented here; it is Sprioza's; Hegel's; Sartre's, I am standing on their shoulders, and, I have, thanks to the infinite riches contained in Spinoza's dictum, invented at least one absolutely new theoretical construct of my own, i.e., jurisprudential illusion; --- the OP is playing absolute hardball within an absolutely tyrannical sociosphere, wherein men are constantly attempting to enslave others, by "law",
which law is totally and radically an overbearing loose cannon which requires resistance sufficient to tie it down.  Jurisprudence needs a goddamn good fucking swift theoretical kick in the balls, for it is a theoretically and ontologically unintelligible series of practices within the sociosphere, which are suffocating and destroying the originally intended reign of human absolute ontological freedom,in certain regions of human conduct, which original Americans insisted upon having in unmolested fashion.  I am playing theoretical hardball with what is the actual nonsense practiced by American jurisprudence, for the sake of getting it and its fucking nonsense off our backs; it,
jurisprudence, is capable, only, of, on and on and on, doing prohibitive law against human beings, which is making us sick, because it has no real understanding of what a  human being is.  Thank you brewer.  Negatio.

bold mine

What fundamental religious beliefs are you destructing?

If you want your position to survive for centuries to come do you plan on publishing and/or peer review? 

How are we enslaved by law, by not allowing absolute free will? I think laws are required in a structured society. My position is that your free will stops where my nose starts and that laws prevent that very well.

Is one of your issues with the way the american law/judicial  system applied and practiced? How is it radically overbearing? I have seemed to thrive within that system very well.

How are we enslaved by law

We can only be so totally inundated with prohibition that we merely begin to suffocate and suffer illness, like committing murder in a courtroom...My absolute original human ontological freedom cannot possibly be lost by me on any wise, however, extant American law does, now, reduce Americans to peons by, e.g., local ordinance ordaining mandatory payment for garbage collection, wherein, upon extended nonpayment, a county attorney will attempt to employ coercion to collect the money, wherein it is promised one's property is subject to lien, for non payment of the perpetual and ongoing garbage fees, (peonage is a state of affairs wherein persons are trapped in perpetual debt), and, the employment of coercion by threat of action at law, in order to hold a person to perform service(s) for payment of the debt, is deemed by extant Federal law to be unlawful attempt to hold persons in peonage, now subsumed under our Thirteenth Amendment, i.e., peonage is now subsumed...
The generator is nigh quitting for a lack of fuel...I must leave off...perhaps tomorrow, when fresh, I can give you clearer response to why law ATTEMPTS to enslave...

---

Is 'radical' your favourite adjective?

Boru

It most certainly appears so.  I'm a Californian.  Radical dude !

Moderator Notice
Woot! I think I got it!