RE: Ontological Disproof of God
August 26, 2018 at 2:10 am
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2018 at 8:07 am by Losty.)
(August 25, 2018 at 10:34 pm)negatio Wrote:Quote:If you want your position to survive for centuries to come do you plan on publishing and/or peer review?
Ha ! Dreamer ! Yes, publishing seems an ideal possibility, however, I am not even sure if people read printed works anymore. At this point, to act in pursuit of the possibility of publication would be a radically difficult objective for me to attain, I only have a B.A., which may not give me sufficient credence in the world of publication. Online is good for now. I wanted to cast my writing out into the world; now, I have, via the internet; and, a certain process has perhaps begun, i.e., that process wherein a person submits a theoretical work to the world, and, then, goes through a series of paradigm stages, which I do not clearly recall at the moment, wherein, at first, his theory is absolutely scorned and rejected as absurd and unworthy nonsense; then, it is seen to be radically acceptable the world; then, the persons who originally maintained the absurdity of the theory, claim it as their own !
Quote:What fundamental religious beliefs are you destructing?Jehovah's mistaken notion that he could efficiently/successfully reign as God, over men,by positing a series of laws, which, he mistakenly thought, would function either to determine man's conduct directly, via the word,or, move men to determine themselves, by law, to act in accordance with law. When, in fact, human conduct does not originate on the basis of given states of affairs like a language of law.
(August 25, 2018 at 9:29 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: bold mine
What fundamental religious beliefs are you destructing?
If you want your position to survive for centuries to come do you plan on publishing and/or peer review?
How are we enslaved by law, by not allowing absolute free will? I think laws are required in a structured society. My position is that your free will stops where my nose starts and that laws prevent that very well.
Is one of your issues with the way the american law/judicial system applied and practiced? How is it radically overbearing? I have seemed to thrive within that system very well.
Quote:How are we enslaved by law
We can only be so totally inundated with prohibition that we merely begin to suffocate and suffer illness, like committing murder in a courtroom...My absolute original human ontological freedom cannot possibly be lost by me on any wise, however, extant American law does, now, reduce Americans to peons by, e.g., local ordinance ordaining mandatory payment for garbage collection, wherein, upon extended nonpayment, a county attorney will attempt to employ coercion to collect the money, wherein it is promised one's property is subject to lien, for non payment of the perpetual and ongoing garbage fees, (peonage is a state of affairs wherein persons are trapped in perpetual debt), and, the employment of coercion by threat of action at law, in order to hold a person to perform service(s) for payment of the debt, is deemed by extant Federal law to be unlawful attempt to hold persons in peonage, now subsumed under our Thirteenth Amendment, i.e., peonage is now subsumed...
The generator is nigh quitting for a lack of fuel...I must leave off...perhaps tomorrow, when fresh, I can give you clearer response to why law ATTEMPTS to enslave...
(August 25, 2018 at 10:04 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Is 'radical' your favourite adjective?
Boru
It most certainly appears so. I'm a Californian. Radical dude !
Moderator Notice
Woot! I think I got it!
ETA fixed it hehe