Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

Yeah, I'm gonna check out for awhile. This discussion seems to be going nowhere.

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

An Important Ramification of Spinoza's Dictum is Disproof of the Deity of Yahweh Jehovah, and Jesus Christ

---

Yeah, I'm gonna check out for awhile. This discussion seems to be going nowhere.

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

An Important Ramification of Spinoza's Dictum is Disproof of the Deity of Yahweh Jehovah, and Jesus Christ

Now, why doesn't it say WROTE after DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN ?!  I want to have it look thus:
DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN  WROTE 
An Important Ramification of ….                                                        I'll try once again:

An Important

---

Yeah, I'm gonna check out for awhile. This discussion seems to be going nowhere.

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

An Important Ramification of Spinoza's Dictum is Disproof of the Deity of Yahweh Jehovah, and Jesus Christ

---

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

Now, why doesn't it say WROTE after DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN ?!  I want to have it look thus:
DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN  WROTE 
An Important Ramification of ….                                                        I'll try once again:

An Important

I swear, the first attempt lacked wrote at the end of my name, then, on the second try, which totally failed, I saw what I wanted to accomplish appearing correctly.  Now, what I want to do is write out the very last sentence of Part I, and, then proceed to the first sentence of Part II, where a theoretical destruction of the fundamental mistaken presupposition employed by modern jurisprudence, begins.  So, now, to attempt to present the last sentence per BB code:

 Therefore, given that "God" can be shown to be seriously mistaken regarding his notion that his language of law is an efficacy in the sphere of human determination to action, we have hewn an avenue through the ontological unintelligibility practiced by inauthentic diety, which avenue leads us to  demonstrating, likewise, the ontological unintelligibility of extant American jurisprudence, thus:

---

Yeah, I'm gonna check out for awhile. This discussion seems to be going nowhere.

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

An Important Ramification of Spinoza's Dictum is Disproof of the Deity of Yahweh Jehovah, and Jesus Christ

---

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

Now, why doesn't it say WROTE after DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN ?!  I want to have it look thus:
DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN  WROTE 
An Important Ramification of ….                                                        I'll try once again:

An Important

---

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

---

Now, why doesn't it say WROTE after DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN ?!  I want to have it look thus:
DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN  WROTE 
An Important Ramification of ….                                                        I'll try once again:

I swear, the first attempt lacked wrote at the end of my name, then, on the second try, which totally failed, I saw what I wanted to accomplish appearing correctly.  Now, what I want to do is write out the very last sentence of Part I, and, then proceed to the first sentence of Part II, where a theoretical destruction of the fundamental mistaken presupposition employed by modern jurisprudence, begins.  So, now, to attempt to present the last sentence per BB code:

 Therefore, given that "God" can be shown to be seriously mistaken regarding his notion that his language of law is an efficacy in the sphere of human determination to action, we have hewn an avenue through the ontological unintelligibility practiced by inauthentic diety, which avenue leads us to  demonstrating, likewise, the ontological unintelligibility of extant American jurisprudence, thus:

 1.   A profound error is transpiring within American jurisprudence, herein dubbed the “jurisprudential illusion”, which error is recognizable via the perspectival view afforded by J.P. Sartre’s theory of origin of human action, a theory predicated upon Baruch Spinoza’s “determinatio negatio est”, i.e., “determination is negation”.

---

Yeah, I'm gonna check out for awhile. This discussion seems to be going nowhere.

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

An Important Ramification of Spinoza's Dictum is Disproof of the Deity of Yahweh Jehovah, and Jesus Christ

---

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

Now, why doesn't it say WROTE after DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN ?!  I want to have it look thus:
DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN  WROTE 
An Important Ramification of ….                                                        I'll try once again:

An Important

---

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

---

Now, why doesn't it say WROTE after DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN ?!  I want to have it look thus:
DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN  WROTE 
An Important Ramification of ….                                                        I'll try once again:

I swear, the first attempt lacked wrote at the end of my name, then, on the second try, which totally failed, I saw what I wanted to accomplish appearing correctly.  Now, what I want to do is write out the very last sentence of Part I, and, then proceed to the first sentence of Part II, where a theoretical destruction of the fundamental mistaken presupposition employed by modern jurisprudence, begins.  So, now, to attempt to present the last sentence per BB code:

 Therefore, given that "God" can be shown to be seriously mistaken regarding his notion that his language of law is an efficacy in the sphere of human determination to action, we have hewn an avenue through the ontological unintelligibility practiced by inauthentic diety, which avenue leads us to  demonstrating, likewise, the ontological unintelligibility of extant American jurisprudence, thus:

---

mh.brewer I am totteringly/clumsily ready to begin writing what I wish to address to this forum,  in the manner which forum members deem exhibits proper respect, by attempting to set forward a title and three sentences via BB code; sending you one at a time, first the title:

---

Now, why doesn't it say WROTE after DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN ?!  I want to have it look thus:
DUANE CLINTON MEEHAN  WROTE 
An Important Ramification of ….                                                        I'll try once again:

---

I swear, the first attempt lacked wrote at the end of my name, then, on the second try, which totally failed, I saw what I wanted to accomplish appearing correctly.  Now, what I want to do is write out the very last sentence of Part I, and, then proceed to the first sentence of Part II, where a theoretical destruction of the fundamental mistaken presupposition employed by modern jurisprudence, begins.  So, now, to attempt to present the last sentence per BB code:

 1.   A profound error is transpiring within American jurisprudence, herein dubbed the “jurisprudential illusion”, which error is recognizable via the perspectival view afforded by J.P. Sartre’s theory of origin of human action, a theory predicated upon Baruch Spinoza’s “determinatio negatio est”, i.e., “determination is negation”.

I swear for me this is like having one's teeth pulled without a nerve blocking injection ! Now, on this last attempt, which did set forth the first sentence of Part II, it does not, on the screen I see now, have Wrote at the end of my proper name … Anyway, the rewritten version of Part I of the OP, which members found so radically outrageous, appears on my thread at page 19 #184, where I have written an elegant kindergarten version of the OP, fortunately, both versions will hunt; one for Newbies and one for Seniors in the language of existential phenomenological ontology !