Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

I would pay to see negatio attempt to order food at a drive-thru.

---

Also, for all of negatio's attempts to dazzle us with vocabulary, most of it is simply riddled with too many flourishes and odd turns of phrase ("while, all the while," using "ilk" without an established reference, etc.).  Good writing is elegant.  I mean, take the following:

Since age thirteen I have spent sixty years reading philosophical writing that takes years and years to understand, and, I thought others relished the same process of encountering a written text which is seemingly unintelligible, and, after tremendous effort, coming to find that it is an absolutely beautiful ilk of thought poetry which transforms you being

A quick rewrite would be:

Since age thirteen I have spent sixty years reading philosophy that takes many years to understand, let alone master.  I thought others relished the same process of encountering text which is seemingly unintelligible at first, but, after tremendous effort, finding that it is actually beautiful thought poetry which transforms your very being

Small changes, but the removal of cruft makes it easier to read.  Like I implied before, there's a difference between style and cramming in as many words as you know.

Assuming you're not a troll (of which I'm absolutely not convinced), learn to edit yourself and accept that in a attempt to transmit ideas, any language that distracts from that transmission should be omitted.  More isn't always better, and requests for clarification aren't an indication of a simple mind.  But, my degree is in communication, so what do I know?

To KevinM1s contention:    attempts to dazzle us with vocabulary
I reply : I am sincerely being modest when I merely want to say that it is impossible to show off one's vocabulary when one's vocabulary is infinite. I am what I am not and am not what I am. Thanks KevinM1. Negatio.