(August 28, 2018 at 12:26 am)negatio Wrote:Quote:What are you on about? One does not need a god, or even a god-myth, to have a functional legal code.What I am "on about'' is examining the unexamined presupposition presumed, historically, by ''god-myth", that deems thexmeans to obviating man's bent to kill; steal; give false testimony against one's neighbor; etc., to be to authoritatively publish a language of law, which language of law is set-forth, unreflectively, absent regard-for the actual way in which men, actually upsurge their acts, for the sake of, by law, obviating killing; stealing; lying; etc.; while, nonetheless, men do not, and, cannot quit doing killing; stealing; lying; etc.; etc.; simply because some Deity; some Legislature; some magistrate posits "law" against doing killing; stealing; lying; etc.; etc., i.e., that men do not, cannot, originate their acts via "law", and, I am on about describing how human persons actually do originate their acts/actions, knowing, that, perhaps, if, and, when, we human persons, interacting within our sociosphere, actually obtain knowledge of how human action actually, ontologically, originates, we will not be able to realize that we do have, all along, the means to obviate killing; stealing; lying; etc., and, that that means is already woven into the structure of our human ontological freedom, but, not yet being reflectively ontologically free, we are unable to employ the ontological means of obviating killing; stealing; lying; enslaving others...Sincerely, Negatio.
Well, good luck with that. Carry on.
