(August 20, 2018 at 9:21 pm)Astreja Wrote:(August 20, 2018 at 6:22 pm)negatio Wrote: Astreja No, only just when our entire American/World legal system is predicated upon the model of an exhalted [sic] high placed jurist passing judgement upon others via an ontologically nonsensical language of law.What are you on about? One does not need a god, or even a god-myth, to have a functional legal code.
(August 20, 2018 at 9:16 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Of course, I can't help appreciate the irony of someone who claims they're too intelligent to clarify and condense what they mean in the same breath as patting themselves for how much studying they've done themselves.
Why tart up one's language to make it smugly incomprehensible, unless the underlying ideas are pure bollocks and the author wants it to be incomprehensible to hide that fatal flaw?
(August 29, 2018 at 7:36 am)Khemikal Wrote:Khemikal, The OP is alleged by me to accomplish disproof of the Deity of the three so called deities we have in western civilization. Philosophy, (and, this is the philosophy forum part of the Atheist Forum), never proceeds on the basis of pure and bare assertion. You cannot merely say the OP is "...not a disproof of any god." You need, somehow, to demonstrate the OP to be failing to disprove "...any god.", rationally, in language. Wherein in politics have you ever heard any politicians discussing the ontological unintelligibility of law ?! Yes, thank you, the OP is a critique of current American civilization, specifically regarding my allegation that American law is ontologically unintelligible when it mistakenly expects persons to move themselves to action, and inaction, by the mere fact that words are published on the pages of codes of law...Negatio.(August 28, 2018 at 11:15 pm)negatio Wrote: The OP is a critique of current American civilization, written in the language of existential phenomenological ontology, and, via employing the intellectual instrumentation of existential phenomenological ontology.(August 28, 2018 at 11:43 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Oh, I get it, you just gave it the wrong title and put it into the wrong section.Quote:I have difficulty following this, that, and, now it. What it are you referencing Khemikal ?!
The OP is a critique of current american civilization, not a disproof of any god. More politics than philosophy, if you ask me.