RE: Ontological Disproof of God
August 30, 2018 at 8:04 pm
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2018 at 8:20 pm by negatio.)
(August 30, 2018 at 6:35 pm)Lucanus Wrote: @ NegatioLucanus, I hope you saw my response to your last post wherein I praised your critique of my run-on sentences; yes I have learned the basic mode of responding; but, somehow, not yet fully understanding how to control what happens before I hit the PostReply button, weird shit is still happening, so what, I am so inundated with member requests for response, that I have little time to spend attempting to further fathom the robot's modus operandi.
So you really don't give a shit about letting other people understand your arguments. I mean, it's ok. But to be honest, if you can't take the criticism, stay out of the forum.
As I probably made clear, English is not my first language, and your style of writing (clearly reminiscent of the classical style of certain Latin and Greek authors I've had the dubious pleasure to translate in high school) is way too abstruse to make me even consider the possibility of trying to make sense of it!
Seeing as we're 18 (or however many) pages into this thread, and this same objection, along with many others, has been met with accusations of "ad hominem" attacks, and you are somehow still borking quotes all over the place, I am even more inclined to doubt in your good faith.
I have just told you, you have successfully convinced me to eliminate my run-on sentencing, and, nonetheless you still insist I am not interested in interpersonal communication; of course I am I interested; and, yes, its all ad hominem argument; - you successfully cast your positive criticism without, at the same time, alienating me as a person by accusing me of inadequacy, etc., etc., etc., as has been the case for many days thus far...we are now at thirty five pages...It is so tiring to have all this constantly be about me; I have tried to explain that it is not about me; fuck me; I am sick of me here...address my position objectively, absent considerations regarding me, for, when you address my position you are, therein addressing me, because it is my position, but, we don't have to keep my fucking fucked-up ass constantly I the foreground, for, there is nothing in the world that is so totally and radically boring than constantly appearing to wish to have everything revolving around one's self...leave the specific me out of the dialogical/dialectical interchange which constitutes the polemical disputational process which is philosophy, and, which is now transpiring in this philosophy sector of the forum ! Thanks a Million, Lucanus. Negatio.
(August 30, 2018 at 11:12 am)mh.brewer Wrote: Negatio falls apart when told he's not as smart as he thinks he is.
Unfortunately, he's able to communicate better when this happens. Maybe the high horse or pedestal is not the place for him.
Yes, brewer, this, your freshest argumentum ad hominem, you so kindly assert that I fall all apart, and then, unfortunately, I communicate better when I am all fallen apart, and, whereas you were for my communicating better, as you put it, you are now saying that communicating better is an unfortunate occurrence . You are not being consistent.
Precisely, my seeming intention to be on high is indeed a fucking drag; being Deity is a horrid bitch.
I actually missed you brewer ! You never have answered my question. Are you a counsellor/attorney/officer of the court/an esquire ? Thank you , sir. Negatio.