Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

@neg: By "it", I meant Yahweh. Yahweh is too stupid to be a deity, as written in the bible, or is playing dumb.

My writing is cryptic? How so?

Excellent humor robvalue, "...too stupid...playing dumb" !!
The Duane-brain is always purring under the hood and, is formulating an answer to the question regarding why it sees your writing as "cryptic".  When it is done it will let me know, and, then, I will tell you !
I have already had to edit a sentence I wrote for Lucanus, in the mode of ordinary language, emphatically demanded by the members, for accuracy, thus:
A profound error is transpiring in law. The error has been named "jurisprudential illusion". Recognition of the jurisprudential illusion error was achieved through my study of J. P. Sartre's theory of origin of  human action. Sartre derived his theory of origination of human action from his study of Hegel's study of Baruch Spinoza's (1632-1677) phrase "...determinatio negatio est...", claimed by Hegel to possess "infinite riches", and, is generally known as Spinoza's dictum, which dictum reads, in English "...determination is negation..." However, Sartre employed 
"Omnis determinatio est negatio.", which is Hegel's rendition of Spinoza's dictum, which, in English, reads: "All determination is negation."