RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 1, 2018 at 4:12 pm
(This post was last modified: September 1, 2018 at 4:30 pm by negatio.)
Lucanus
way too abstruse
Please show me an example of what you find too abstruse. You gave me excellent criticism regarding run-on sentencing, I adopted the advice; however, you just keep ragging and ragging, on and on ! ? There are indeed ad hominem attacks continually directed against me, in is inadmissible in philosophy to attack persons, it is a person's position which is the proper object of attack. The entire OP is not abstruse in every portion thereof; Part I., rewritten, describes the double nihilation in a more simplified way, in smaller words...philosophy is normally rather difficult to comprehend instantaneously, it usually takes a good bit of effort. I believe the rewritten segment is on page 19 at #184. And, I posted, to you,the rewritten first sentence of Part II. I do care to communicate, I have implemented changes you have demanded; however, I am indeed really beginning not to give a goddamn fucking shit what you do or do not want to put any effort into understanding; you have become an asset to me, however, you are being absolutely tactless, therefore, you are making me angry by the rude way you are irrepressibly going at me; - go at any portion of my position which you might possibly be able to,(oh, I see, the position is too abstruse to understand, therefore you cannot even begin refutation !). I have written an introduction explaining how I will be explaining the entire rest of the essay in terms of Lincoln's famous report of how he addressed others: "Tell them. Tell them what you told them; and, then tell them again." P.S., Yesterday my generator died a horrid death. Today the store shelves were bare of generators; so, I bought from what was available, and came-up with a big brute which costs $2.50 per hour in fuel, not to mention oil, which generators burn like wildfire, not to mention the cost of the generator itself, so, don't fucking try to tell me that I am not interested in communicating ! Negatio.
way too abstruse
Please show me an example of what you find too abstruse. You gave me excellent criticism regarding run-on sentencing, I adopted the advice; however, you just keep ragging and ragging, on and on ! ? There are indeed ad hominem attacks continually directed against me, in is inadmissible in philosophy to attack persons, it is a person's position which is the proper object of attack. The entire OP is not abstruse in every portion thereof; Part I., rewritten, describes the double nihilation in a more simplified way, in smaller words...philosophy is normally rather difficult to comprehend instantaneously, it usually takes a good bit of effort. I believe the rewritten segment is on page 19 at #184. And, I posted, to you,the rewritten first sentence of Part II. I do care to communicate, I have implemented changes you have demanded; however, I am indeed really beginning not to give a goddamn fucking shit what you do or do not want to put any effort into understanding; you have become an asset to me, however, you are being absolutely tactless, therefore, you are making me angry by the rude way you are irrepressibly going at me; - go at any portion of my position which you might possibly be able to,(oh, I see, the position is too abstruse to understand, therefore you cannot even begin refutation !). I have written an introduction explaining how I will be explaining the entire rest of the essay in terms of Lincoln's famous report of how he addressed others: "Tell them. Tell them what you told them; and, then tell them again." P.S., Yesterday my generator died a horrid death. Today the store shelves were bare of generators; so, I bought from what was available, and came-up with a big brute which costs $2.50 per hour in fuel, not to mention oil, which generators burn like wildfire, not to mention the cost of the generator itself, so, don't fucking try to tell me that I am not interested in communicating ! Negatio.
