RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 2, 2018 at 3:22 pm
(This post was last modified: September 2, 2018 at 4:34 pm by negatio.)
(September 2, 2018 at 6:48 am)negatio Wrote:(September 2, 2018 at 3:40 am)Pandæmonium Wrote: Hmm...
My pro-tips for operating on this forum, OP. First is to accurately use the quotation function. I can see you’re able to edit posts quite easily, and indeed utilise common forum languages and shorthand (OP is an example), so I’m not sure why you’re unable to use this when the BB code is actually very simple and user friendly.
Not doing this is both frustrating for other members who are trying to communicate with you (responding without quoting will not alert them, and if you start cutting and moving text and not adding in additional quotation tags it stymies the flow of your post at best and makes it unreadable at worst) and, to be frank, draws suspicion.
In addition, I’m not here to tell people how to write their posts, but from my long experience moderating and posting on a wide number of forums, people who refer to themselves in the 3rd person, and write in an overly verbose and tangential fashion, are often not genuine in their attempts at discourse. Again, I’m not here to tell you how to write, but the reaction you will (continue) to get from posters is one of frustration and annoyance as people will find it very difficult to decipher what it is you’re trying to say (and that’s not due to a lack of comepetencies on their part, many of our members are very well read in a wide variety of disciplines as you’ll see from perusing previous threads). People want to talk to other members, but if it feels like they’re having a conversation with a poorly programmed chat bot, they’ll soon lose interest.
Those are my pro tips - take them or leave them.
(September 2, 2018 at 6:33 am)Losty Wrote: OP can mean original post or original poster. So they’re either referring to your first post or to you specifically.Yes, thank you. Why is a box with KevinM1's "I am not a troll." constantly appearing in some sort of sub-ground on my thread, from August 21st ??? Negatio.
Quote:I can see you’re able to edit posts quite easily, and indeed utilise common forum languages and shorthand (OP is an example), so I’m not sure why you’re unable to use this
You lost me at "this", what this ? Negatio.
(September 2, 2018 at 3:08 pm)emjay Wrote:Oh, wow, emjay, what a perfectly expressed and humanitarian instruction, wow, now I see ! The members railed at my for ten straight days speaking to "quoting", "...you're not quoting correctly !...", so, I employed the quote function, and, then, that became a disaster ! I am not really going to let all of the AI stuff get me down, I will learn in time, and so many beautiful members are coming to my rescue...this is both nice, and a damn nightmare ! Negatio.(September 2, 2018 at 3:01 pm)negatio Wrote: Emjay, again, thank you, precisely, when people, especially a person in authority around here, employs "this" when attempting to explain something to me, and, thereby, totally losers me, I am simply left hanging, stuck; and, then, an authority person does not even bother to respond to one's imploring requests to explain why, perhaps, one should always use the quote button, when, in fact, the reply button is so smooth and easy...now, I am being blamed for something the artificial intelligence mediating this site is doing, by mistake...this is spiraling into such extreme difficulty in dealing with the artificially intelligent robot, and, so much energy is being invested in wrangling about the retarded robot, no one has even noticed, that in my last respone to Robvalue, I finally expressed what I am saying in a relatively simple, and, very straightforward manner, which deserves kudo ! ? Negatio.
No... no... DON'T USE THE "QUOTE" BUTTON; if you don't ever touch that button, you'll be fine. Just do what I said one more time... that is click on 'deselect' at the bottom of the screen like I said before... then after that never ever press the "Quote" button because that button is used for multiquoting and you're not ready for that, and it's that that is, indirectly, causing all these problems.
(August 31, 2018 at 7:32 am)mh.brewer Wrote:Brewer, the ass who originally accused me of being on some weird-ass drugs; you are so radically stuck on stupid, mean and horrid, that I cannot possibly stand any more of your hateful bullshit. I am now asking you, like I had to do with KevinM1, to totally forget that I exist, and leave me the fuck alone. I have bent over backwards to politely reply to all of your questions, and, you are just too too over-the-top, as an inveterate, wretched, ass. Negatio.(August 30, 2018 at 9:47 pm)negatio Wrote:
brewer Very interesting, you are ''something'', never. In existentialism it is maintained consciousness, a nothingness, which is what you and I are, is a not, which, in fact can never, ever, Be, anything. Consciousness is perpetually not what it is and what it is not, i.e., a constant thrust into an absent future as a perpetual engagement in nothingness, doubly nihilating as non-being past a past, and unto a not-yet, perpetually remaking itself anew, daily; thus, one can not be, is not, "Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals"; or, a Philosopher; or a thief; a murderer...for by the time you characterize a certain person as being such and such, he is already elsewhere, for, he is a perpetual elsewhere...i.e., freedom. Brewer, Brewer, Brewer. The enigmatic Brewer...Negato.
I don't care about existentialism. And you don't follow to well. I suggest that you expand your horizons.
(September 2, 2018 at 6:48 am)negatio Wrote:(September 2, 2018 at 3:40 am)Pandæmonium Wrote: Hmm...
My pro-tips for operating on this forum, OP. First is to accurately use the quotation function. I can see you’re able to edit posts quite easily, and indeed utilise common forum languages and shorthand (OP is an example), so I’m not sure why you’re unable to use this when the BB code is actually very simple and user friendly.
Not doing this is both frustrating for other members who are trying to communicate with you (responding without quoting will not alert them, and if you start cutting and moving text and not adding in additional quotation tags it stymies the flow of your post at best and makes it unreadable at worst) and, to be frank, draws suspicion.
In addition, I’m not here to tell people how to write their posts, but from my long experience moderating and posting on a wide number of forums, people who refer to themselves in the 3rd person, and write in an overly verbose and tangential fashion, are often not genuine in their attempts at discourse. Again, I’m not here to tell you how to write, but the reaction you will (continue) to get from posters is one of frustration and annoyance as people will find it very difficult to decipher what it is you’re trying to say (and that’s not due to a lack of comepetencies on their part, many of our members are very well read in a wide variety of disciplines as you’ll see from perusing previous threads). People want to talk to other members, but if it feels like they’re having a conversation with a poorly programmed chat bot, they’ll soon lose interest.
Those are my pro tips - take them or leave them.
(September 2, 2018 at 6:33 am)Losty Wrote: OP can mean original post or original poster. So they’re either referring to your first post or to you specifically.Yes, thank you. Why is a box with KevinM1's "I am not a troll." constantly appearing in some sort of sub-ground on my thread, from August 21st ??? Negatio.
Quote:I can see you’re able to edit posts quite easily, and indeed utilise common forum languages and shorthand (OP is an example), so I’m not sure why you’re unable to use this
You lost me at "this", what this ? Negatio.
