Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

This board does not REQUIRE knowledge of BB code either. Stop pretending that it does.

In so far as, in order to correctly address you in response just now I had to use two bits of what I think I am correct in remembering that it is called BB code.  Yes, I could press enter twice to double space, and indeed I will; however not necessarily in a quick reply like the one I am doing now.  I am usually in too much of a rush even to think to press enter twice, when, for  instance, I am being unwarrantedly accused falsely of something which would have constituted me a fraud on this site !  Indeed, if and when I post a re-written OP, I assure you, Abaddon, I will double space...here in reply I see it is commonplace for members to use single spacing. Anyway, gee wizz, thanks a million for positing another OP for me !  Goddamn, that is a fucking radically beautifully constructed piece of poetry, damn; and I'll bet you understood the language, if not the concepts...of that critique of jurisprudence.
Pretending ?!  Did I not just go through absolute fucking hell, for days, in the travail of learning what, to me was a totally confusing and cryptic language; furthermore, there is a vast series of BB codes one can employ on this site; I am happy for now to know just the one equation; the question now becomes, does knowing only one equation constitute knowledge of BB code ?  Why do you so insist on picking an argument with me, personally, argue against my OP if you want to argue; that is what is proper in philosophy i.e., arguing against a fellow's position, not his person !  Either construct a viable and rational argument against my position, or, any part of the position, or, please, get off my personal case. I may be the most horrid psychopath; the basest murderer; the anti-Christ; all that I am is absolutely indifferent here; what is properly focused on is my position, and, if you cannot destroy my position, you have, tacitly, conceded.  Negatio.