Ontological Disproof of God

[Abaddon_ire]

This board does not REQUIRE knowledge of BB code either. Stop pretending that it does.

In so far as, in order to correctly address you in response just now I had to use two bits of what I think I am correct in remembering that it is called BB code. 

Bull.

Yes, I could press enter twice to double space, and indeed I will; however not necessarily in a quick reply like the one I am doing now. 

Baloney. If you gave a single flying **** about actually communicating whatever the **** your ideas might be, then you would make sure to actually communicate effectively. Yet here we are hundreds of posts in and you simply do not care.

I am usually in too much of a rush even to think to press enter twice, when, for  instance, I am being unwarrantedly accused falsely of something which would have constituted me a fraud on this site !

Knock it off with the extraneous space between sentence end and punctuation. It is a tactic with which I am most familiar. Those that deploy it always do so knowingly, particularly when it is pointed out as an error many times. It can only be intentional by now.

Indeed, if and when I post a re-written OP, I assure you, Abaddon, I will double space...here in reply I see it is commonplace for members to use single spacing.

The space key and the enter key are different keys on your keyboard.

Anyway, gee wizz, thanks a million for positing another OP for me !  Goddamn, that is a fucking radically beautifully constructed piece of poetry, damn; and I'll bet you understood the language, if not the concepts...of that critique of jurisprudence.

I am not american, nor do I live in america. I don't care about US jurisprudence. It does not apply to me in any way. You seem to think it is somehow important. It isn't.

Pretending ?!  Did I not just go through absolute fucking hell, for days, in the travail of learning what, to me was a totally confusing and cryptic language; furthermore, there is a vast series of BB codes one can employ on this site; I am happy for now to know just the one equation; the question now becomes, does knowing only one equation constitute knowledge of BB code ? 

But you did not have to do so. You simply chose to do so in order to obscure your ham-handed failure of ontological rubbish.

Why do you so insist on picking an argument with me, personally, argue against my OP if you want to argue; that is what is proper in philosophy i.e., arguing against a fellow's position, not his person !

I can only address that which I can read. As far as I am concerned, members here have fallen over themselves to help you. You don't care.

Either construct a viable and rational argument against my position, or, any part of the position, or, please, get off my personal case.

I would happily do so if you could simply produce any argument at all. But you seem unable to do so.

I may be the most horrid psychopath; the basest murderer; the anti-Christ;

There is no "Christ" or "anti-Christ". You might be a psycopath or murderer, I have no way to tell one way or the other.

all that I am is absolutely indifferent here; what is properly focused on is my position, and, if you cannot destroy my position, you have, tacitly, conceded.  Negatio.

You are not indifferent at all.

You really have no idea how comprehensively you have burned bridges.