RE: Peterson's 12 Rules For Life, have you heard of this?
September 4, 2018 at 8:03 pm
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2018 at 8:12 pm by bennyboy.)
(September 4, 2018 at 7:21 pm)Khemikal Wrote:Uh huh.(September 4, 2018 at 7:12 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Wow. . . backtracking much? I'm still waiting for you to source your links on the horrible conspiracy of IQ racist science, and you've bone back to that?Follow the advice of that smart man, Benjamin Boy, when he mentioned that smart people like him go and investigate the information. Unlike the rest of us identity politicking dummies, ofc, lol.
OR you can back up your own damned claims. That will save me time and effort, and will show that you aren't pulling stats out of your ass.
(September 4, 2018 at 7:21 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Like, that she's out to gulag the world with the "murderous doctrine" of equality? Is that what Peterson knows about her? Did he intercept emails from the latest homicidal vagenda meeting? You don't remember conceding this point, at all...do you?
I don't KNOW why he said that about her. Either he's attacking her because he hates women, and she's representing women-- or he has another beef with her. I can't imagine he'd really express the former in that way, so I believe it's probably the latter.
If the guy is against women's marches, or women, then I for sure wouldn't support that; I shouldn't have to say it, but let's be clear about it. If he's against her specifically (or Trudeau), then we'll have to know what his beef is with her before we can intelligently discuss that post.
I never said the guy is my god (you said that, not me) or that he's always right. I'm perfectly capable of disagreeing with him. I disagree, for example, with the way he waffles about religion. I still don't know if he's a theist or not.
But the problem is that you see the word "women," and you instantly go full-trigger SJW without bothering to actually find out why he said that. That's weak.