(September 5, 2018 at 9:16 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Words and words and words.
Could've simply typed;
"Nuh uh, am too right!".
Your entire participation on the boards summed up in two short sentences.
"God's awfully dumb for a god"
and
"Nu uh!"
-interspersed with long intervals of complete incompetence.
Let's try another track. If you think that language is so utterly devoid of compelling effect...why are you arguing a case against gods (or law) in the first place?
Take your time. An explanation to that nut is going to take some serious twisting of the scrotum.
Yea, sure, I am going to stand before everyone on earth and say "God's awfully dumb for a God." Wow, that would be so profound that I would, without a doubt, win a Nobel prize, gee, why didn't I think of that. No, Khemikcal, one's language at the philosophical level must be set forward consistently with the entire history of intelligible philosophical thought for thousands of years back. I said language of law is without compelling effect. What compelling effect has my language had on the forum, on you just now, not much ! It is ideation, truthful ideation, that is compelling among men, and, language is ideation that can be compelling, but not determinative of human conduct, ever, because determination is negation, and, all given language is a given, not an absence, when, in fact we humans are determined to act by absences, not be stuff which is already here with us....I am exhausted and will not be able to write accurately...great, beautiful interchange Khemikal, I call it dialogical dialectic, but those words are not mine, they come out of thousands of years of dialogical dialectic among persons. Goodnight, Negatio.
