(September 6, 2018 at 10:33 pm)negatio Wrote:(September 6, 2018 at 8:18 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Nope. OP is incoherent. Every further attempt is incoherent. You have insisted ever since that such incoherency is simply "your style". One is thus provoked to wonder why it is that you double down on such a presentation. It can't be that you want to present your ideas. If you did want to communicate your ideas, you would at least make some attempt at a modicum of clarity, but no. Honking great walls of abstruse text are the order of the day.[quote = "Abaddon_ire"
Quite obviously, you have absolutely no interest in being understood by anyone, this is all an exercise in navel gazing onanism to you. Nobody here is forcing you to CHANGE your message, we are all simply telling you how to effectively communicate said message. You appear not to care whether your message is communicated to anyone. One must thus wonder thus what the hell are you here for.
An ontological disproof of god? Nope.
(September 6, 2018 at 10:33 pm)negatio Wrote: Am in middle of sorting out electrical problem in cabin;No, you bare engaged in the careful construction of a death trap
(September 6, 2018 at 10:33 pm)negatio Wrote: do not have any light in computer room; I just about have it licked.No it is still a death trap of your own incompetent manufacture.
(September 6, 2018 at 10:33 pm)negatio Wrote: You are mistaken about the OP being incoherent.Except that everybody else agrees. Why is that?
(September 6, 2018 at 10:33 pm)negatio Wrote: The problem here is precisely analogous to the problem I have comprehending computer code absent any background whatsoever in computer theory...I will respond, but it has got to be a little later...NegatioExcept that everyone here knows you are lying. Why is that?