RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 7, 2018 at 9:42 am
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2018 at 9:47 am by Losty.)
(September 6, 2018 at 4:12 pm)Khemikal Wrote: If you don't win a popularity contest, you're going to leave?
LOL, good luck.
-and this is why you will never possess a solid argument, even though one can certainly be found.
No, consensus is the means scientists agree, or disagree, among themselves, in their process of progressing in
science. (See: Jurgen Habermas, "Knowledge and Human Interest"). It has nothing to do with popularity!
Precisely what "this" is that?!
Oh, I possess a goddamn solid argument; said argument is staring you directly in the face, however, you cannot
see it. Until you fill me in on the exact meaning of your "this", I cannot clearly fathom what you are trying to tell
me here, although, via your "never" it appears that you possess an ability to predict the future. Shit, if I were
you I would employ a capacity for future prediction at the Kentucky Derby!
While you are confident argument is certainly to be found, with you predictive capacity, you should be able to
describe, for everyone, said presently-absent solid argument; instead of constantly telling me, and telling me,
and telling me, that said argument certainly can be found. So, where is said absent solid argument now?
Sounds to me that you may know what and where the missing argument is. Please stop continuously telling
about your ghost argument; and, write it out yourself, and, if you cannot, or, will not; mine is the only such
argument on the table, and, if you cannot find the absent argument you are so sure has some type of existence
or other; you are, thereby, thrown onto the possibility of voting mine to be prima facie viable, or not. Negatio.
Moderator Notice
Edited to fix quote 😒
Edited to fix quote 😒
