Negatio,
You claim to present an ontological disproof of a deity. Nobody can make head nor tail of it and we are mostly atheists here anyway.
What is your objective? Presenting your "killer" argument cant be it. You have fought tooth and nail to avoid that.
You have even gone so far as to wehittle everyone's time in service to...something. You have stated that your ontocobblers argument stands on its own merits but it has no merits.
So why are you here posting this word salad.
I can simply state that I am here entirely by accident, and having wandered in found myself quite liking a wide range of fellow atheists posting here. I like it.
You, on the other hand, rocked up with a wall of abstruse text that nobody could parse purporting to have an ontobollocks disproof of a particular deity.
Clearly, you have no interest in expounding any of your ideas, in fact you have repeatedly stated that you will not do so under any circumstance, hence the quote fail fiasco that rumbles on. TO THIS DAY.
Can you even attempt to explain all that, or shall we consider it an example of the sunk cost fallacy? Because I am not buying that anyone is this idiotic without intent.
You claim to present an ontological disproof of a deity. Nobody can make head nor tail of it and we are mostly atheists here anyway.
What is your objective? Presenting your "killer" argument cant be it. You have fought tooth and nail to avoid that.
You have even gone so far as to wehittle everyone's time in service to...something. You have stated that your ontocobblers argument stands on its own merits but it has no merits.
So why are you here posting this word salad.
I can simply state that I am here entirely by accident, and having wandered in found myself quite liking a wide range of fellow atheists posting here. I like it.
You, on the other hand, rocked up with a wall of abstruse text that nobody could parse purporting to have an ontobollocks disproof of a particular deity.
Clearly, you have no interest in expounding any of your ideas, in fact you have repeatedly stated that you will not do so under any circumstance, hence the quote fail fiasco that rumbles on. TO THIS DAY.
Can you even attempt to explain all that, or shall we consider it an example of the sunk cost fallacy? Because I am not buying that anyone is this idiotic without intent.
