Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

No, you are incorrect. I studied-up on the third person.  It is proper to refer to a persona in the third person, because the persona, in this instance, Negatio, really has nothing to do with the writing.

Perhaps it will help if I describe my particular consciousness somewhat.  I, through my studies in the phenomenology of human consciousness, have become what in known as "reflectively free", thereby, my consciousness traverses a larger spectrum of self-consciousness, or, of being-for-itself, than practically all other persons; i.e., I have a conscious knowledge of how I create my acts; I know that my consciousness is a reflection reflecting. Reflection reflecting is a duality wherein I can either be in reflection, or can be in reflecting, and, dependent upon which portion my consciousness I am in at any given moment, the subject-predicate structures of the way I express myself will differ. I can refer to myself as Other, because, I know that my being is a perpetual pursuit of becoming Other that I am; I am always that which I am not, and, am not what I am, in a perpetual flight toward my future. I am always and continuously Other, thus I refer to myself as Other than I am...Get it ?!  Duane