RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 9, 2018 at 6:14 pm
(This post was last modified: September 9, 2018 at 6:16 pm by negatio.)
(September 9, 2018 at 5:37 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Sexism = accusing me of being a woman having their period, as though a woman having their period is somehow overly emotional, or unnecessarily critical. It's a sexist bullshit response, designed to impugn me by implying I'm acting like a woman, as though a woman is inferior.
Yes, #184 is better. It's still not great. Paragraphs would be nice (as in, a clean line between ideas, as is event in this very post). Cleaning up superfluous commas would be nice. More clarity re: how laws, man's determination, and the Christian concept of god interact would be nice.
Regarding my attitude towards you, yeah, I take a dim view to people who post something, and then attack those who ask "wait, what?" out of hand. Tut-tutting people for not having taken the time to familiarize themselves with the background material, to the point of calling them lazy and of weak and/or lesser minds while, at the same time, gloating about your own superiority and the amount of effort it's taken you to grasp this material is, frankly, the hallmark of an asshole. Continuing to do it when people - some politely, some not - ask you to climb down from your ivory tower and take the effort to make it more digestible is straight trolling. And, no, your weak justifications for it have no merit.
Don't want to be called a troll? Then cut the shit and act like an actual person. Do you bombard your family and friends with philosophy and then chastise them for not being able to grasp it? Do you insult people in your real life as being lazy or of a lesser mind?
My attitude towards you is directly proportional to the attitude you've exhibited so far. If you're not happy with me, well, look in the mirror, because that's where the actual problem lies.
KevinM!, you have been on my case, big time, ever since I arrived here. Look at the history of your posts; and, you swing back and forth between nice, and, being a little dick! You address me in such a hostile, disrespectful, and condescending manner in your continuous harassing attempts to make me over into a being which you prefer for me, and, so is everyone else. Did you see the great interaction between Vulcanlogician and Negatio, where I explained why I write the way I write; however, you constantly insist that my being me is entirely insufficient. Your above criticism takes the same condescending tone, yea, sure, you are going to make me over into the image of you, and, then, all will be well. To me as an older guy, you are coming-off, in the past, and now, in a very peevish and immature fashion, ordering me to straighten-up and fly it right! And, so are many others, who scream scream for simplicity...read the Vulcanlogician/Negatio interchange from yesterday because, the dialectical pressure which Vulcanlogician subjected me to, in gentlemanly fashion, excited me to giving him a solid answer regarding why I had to write the OP in the way in which I did. Negatio.
