Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

RE: the bolded -

You're right.  That's because I'm of two minds regarding you:

1. On the off chance you're not simply trolling us, I'd honestly rather have a new member in the community than not.  So, part of me does want to help you.

2. That said, I'm about 99% certain that you're simply having a good laugh at our expense, because who simply:

• Dumps a poorly formatted treatise on a bunch of strangers without any kind of introduction?
  
• Uses a random online forum as a digital archive when there's so many better options (which have been laid out for you)?
  
• Becomes irrationally defensive and rude when people ask for clarification/better formatting/less superfluously flourished language?
  
• Takes 18.5 (roughly) pages to not even meet us half way with the above?
  

Kevin, you are looking at me strictly from the provincial perspectival view of the world view which you entertain here within the forum. You completely neglect the facts that I did not know, when I posted the OP, that there was a series of persons on the forum, which was not picked at total random, who had the perspectives which you describe as ''dumping'' a ''wall of text''...'..for a good troll laugh at other's expense...absent ''introduction''.  I absolutely neither knew  of, nor could have possibly intended all of those things, absolutely not.  Politely informing someone they lack intellectual instrumentation requisite to understanding is not meant an insult/rudeness, it is simply a statement of what I am advising a person regading what a person may lack when he is unsure, and the paper ''may'' have something to it. The paper does in fact have something to it, and, I am informing him that his doubt is probably based in his lacks, rather than the paper's.
I am never, ever, irrational, son.

My responsibilities in the matter lie completely outside of all considerations concerning persons who's youth and cognitive development; who's lack of existentialist tools of thought hinder comprehension; those persons I must leave to wallow in their own freedom, for, I cannot learn the text for them, and, neither will I take a sledge hammer to the result of thirty years of hard won familiarity with the most difficult of concepts, thereby ruining a masterpiece to accommodate others  not able, for whatever reasons, to follow, to comprehend; I will not detotalize an accomplishment of mine in order to cull  undeveloped persons; let them develop, and, let not me undevelop. 

Why do 99% of members always have to pair accosting me with flippant, nasty, revolting insult, disrespect, disparagement, accusation, hatefulness and ignoble agumentum ad hominem? What has happened to civility? Negatio.