RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 10, 2018 at 3:25 pm
(This post was last modified: September 10, 2018 at 3:27 pm by negatio.)
(September 10, 2018 at 1:52 pm)LastPoet Wrote:(September 9, 2018 at 3:00 am)negatio Wrote: No, you are incorrect. I studied-up on the third person. It is proper to refer to a persona in the third person, because the persona, in this instance, Negatio, really has nothing to do with the writing.
Those that refer to themselves in third person are mostly people that have nothing to show for.
May I remind you that you are a guest in this forum, that your presence here is allowed wilst whithin the forum rules. You were warned of your disruptive behaviour. The purpose of a warning is to exactly do that, that a member has run afoul of the forum rules, to give an opportunity to those that want to correct their misshappen. Those that do not, eventually, terminate at a permanent ban from this site. Is this your purpose here?
If you do not like this place, why do you stay here? Is your philosophy so weak, that you are paused for simple replies?
You have things ass-backwards. I was not merely warned, I was punished, and, this punishment was administered while my code was far far better than ever, having only an extra space or so, which is partly ascribable to incorrect information/confusing information provided by staff
What does "'nothing to show for'mean ?
Replies do not correlate to philosophy; it is simply that my code IQ is 0.00001, and philosophy IQ closer to 200. I ran afoul of rules under conditions wherein I was constantly, non-stop, being harassed and INSULTED by forum members, which, I come to find is a no no way to treat Newbies; review the record, see how I was treated, while being whipsawed by factions simultaneously giving contradictory advice on proper code; in addition it constitutes a systematically misleading double-speak to address someone while using the same term to refer to two different processes, all of which constituted a stressful schizophrenogenic double bind, wherein I was confused and my personality was drifting into a split, thus the appearance of incorrectly self-referencing.
Your mode of addressing me is precisely insulting. No I don't like it around here, I have been severely misused by a multitude of hateful and insulting people who see trolls coming out of the walls, totally psycho bullshit misapplied to a person coming aboard for the sake of engaging in dialogical dialectic, which dialectic is the raison de etre for staying in an absolute hell of member misconduct, even staff was/is insulting via thisl destructive troll paranoia. I do not leave anywhere simply because some flippant chicken-shit like you demands it ! Negatio
