(September 11, 2018 at 8:12 pm)negatio Wrote: I am not actually incorrect about the rule being discussed, which it appears you hadn't heard of. Since there is so much difference of opinion regarding the meaning of the rule, an arbitrator may have to ultimately decide. Insulting me now is in poor taste while you are in your evening cups. I still want to write you that essay on crakers...Negatio
Narcissism at it's finest. Neggy gets to come into a forum that's been operational for years, not be a member of staff, not had a conversation about what the rule(s) mean or their application, but does get to apply his interpretation as the only correct one and then claim victimization.
How the hell did you ever climb on that superiority horse neggy? Be careful of the height, your fall may be devastating.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
