(September 11, 2018 at 10:40 pm)Whilst we are generally lenient with insulting language / rudeness in other forums, this kind of behaviour is explicitly disallowed in the Introductions forum. Please welcome new members to the community in a nice manner, or refrain from welcoming them at all. Wrote: Note that this does not give you a carte blanche to act in an insulting or rude manner in other areas of the forums. Please try to be welcoming and friendly at all times, even if a member is disagreeing with you. Rather than engaging with obvious spammers and trolls, please report them to the staff and let us take care of them. Jörmungandr
(September 11, 2018 at 8:01 pm)negatio Wrote: One cannot differentiate until deeper study of a block of language posited as a totality under the rubric "rule(s)" which are, all, prima facie intended to be law.
You are now doing what emjay did, and, attempt to force differentiate of one part of the totality as rule, from another part thereof that you want to arbitrarily deem is not rule; when, in fact, a selfsame block of different descriptive sentences, all posited under the rubric "rule", constitutes each particular sentence within the totality a rule, per the fact that one single declarative sentence, being part of a totality dubbed law, is rule, simply by virtue of being a part of the larger ensemble.
No, I did not. I pointed out that even if it were treated as a rule it would not have the effect you think it does. Now you're boring the shit out of me. You're nothing but a self-important douchebag.
Introductions Forum Rules
