RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 12, 2018 at 5:43 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2018 at 6:18 am by negatio.)
No, I have not read whatever it is you sent me. What does pushing things mean, nothing absent specific language, from you filling-in ''pushing things"can suffice for understanding of you language.
I have made it absolutely clear that I am here to overthrow ontological unintelligibility in law. You and others of your staff have come at me with law directed against my person, bringing philosophical discussion to an end upon my thread. I am being wholly and entirely consistent with my original reason for being here. You should not have pulled a chicken-shit bullshit bust on me absent an open hearing and, in the Kafkaesque fashion which you have so inadvisedly, chosen to employ! You have, very simply, radically angered me with a bullshit bust done merely for the sake of fucking with the newbie, who must, absolutely must, from your viewpoint, be a troll.
I am in process of describing the inconsistent and inauthentic manner in which staff is mediating forum law, because, you came at me with your law and destroyed a process of dialogical dialectic transpiring within the philosophy forum. I was working as hard as possible to learn just one very important bit of BB code. I was a few too many spaces away from that accomplishment, so, instead of merely specifically informing me where there were too many absences present within my code, of which Losty was completely aware, you, instead, pulled a Kafka style bust on me. I am in process of accomplishing theoretical destruction of the forum's legal system, staff precipitated the present state of affair by stupidly coming at a man who has just posted a theoretical destruction of law upon your forum. It may have been radically stupid of you to poke a sleeping tiger, for, that seems to be precisely what you have done; you have affronted me, and, I can readily dismantle your Kafkaesque system of jurisprudence. You have provided me with a perfect laboratory for empirical experimentation in the destruction of unintelligible legal systems. Do you begin to see what you have done ?
I have made it absolutely clear that I am here to overthrow ontological unintelligibility in law. You and others of your staff have come at me with law directed against my person, bringing philosophical discussion to an end upon my thread. I am being wholly and entirely consistent with my original reason for being here. You should not have pulled a chicken-shit bullshit bust on me absent an open hearing and, in the Kafkaesque fashion which you have so inadvisedly, chosen to employ! You have, very simply, radically angered me with a bullshit bust done merely for the sake of fucking with the newbie, who must, absolutely must, from your viewpoint, be a troll.
I am in process of describing the inconsistent and inauthentic manner in which staff is mediating forum law, because, you came at me with your law and destroyed a process of dialogical dialectic transpiring within the philosophy forum. I was working as hard as possible to learn just one very important bit of BB code. I was a few too many spaces away from that accomplishment, so, instead of merely specifically informing me where there were too many absences present within my code, of which Losty was completely aware, you, instead, pulled a Kafka style bust on me. I am in process of accomplishing theoretical destruction of the forum's legal system, staff precipitated the present state of affair by stupidly coming at a man who has just posted a theoretical destruction of law upon your forum. It may have been radically stupid of you to poke a sleeping tiger, for, that seems to be precisely what you have done; you have affronted me, and, I can readily dismantle your Kafkaesque system of jurisprudence. You have provided me with a perfect laboratory for empirical experimentation in the destruction of unintelligible legal systems. Do you begin to see what you have done ?
