Actually, I would be curious to see the argument in more capable hands, if you have an example of it being pitched by someone else.
I never did get full answers on either the conflict between Sartre's existentialism and other models of freedom, nor how a double nihilation contradicted theological assumptions.
Ultimately, Khem is right, God did know people wouldn't keep the law, and he made that clear many times. So the fundamental contradiction, that an omniscient God would know that the law is ineffectual for regulating behavior and the charge that the Christian God did not know that the law would be ineffectual for regulating behavior does not exist. He did know.
I never did get full answers on either the conflict between Sartre's existentialism and other models of freedom, nor how a double nihilation contradicted theological assumptions.
Ultimately, Khem is right, God did know people wouldn't keep the law, and he made that clear many times. So the fundamental contradiction, that an omniscient God would know that the law is ineffectual for regulating behavior and the charge that the Christian God did not know that the law would be ineffectual for regulating behavior does not exist. He did know.