(September 20, 2011 at 10:03 pm)TheouLive Wrote: That in the same way atheists are not considerate for other faiths in their statements, so individuals who are racist are especially not considerate, and intentionally offend other ethnicity's.
So basically you can take meaning from a statement that wasn't there, have me question it and then use that to imply character traits that I don't possess. If you are comparing atheists to racists, I fear (hope), you will not make many friends here.
Quote:If you hurt anyone else physically, emotionally or mentally that is negative.
So, you propose that everyone be against anything that does the above? This is not feasible. Say a rapist wants to have at me (a stretch, I know), it pains him physically to deny himself sex, which is true for all of us. Should I feel bad if he doesn't get the chance to rape me because it was a negative thing for him? And if he does, then it is negative for me. You see? Opposing something as intangible as "negativity" is quite silly.
Quote:I prioritize the first sentence as what should universally be seen as negative.
Your first meaning the ridiculously absurd one I quoted. Yes, you shouldn't hurt people if you can avoid it, but sometimes, either way, something negative happens. You can't be so vague in your antiisms without eventually hating everyone. I really can think of no other word save silly.
Quote:Sooner or later, a world government or collaboration on a global level will be needed to solve issues for the very survival of humanity on the basis that humanity is a growing population and we have limited resources.
Oh, goodness. I can see it now. "World government bans negativity!" That's a headline I never want to write.
