Kavanaugh Can Join Thomas.

[Angrboda]

Your article says that Smyth has no knowledge of either the party or the assault.  That doesn't help any. (The article you cite doesn't claim that Smyth denies the assault took place.  If you have an actual instance of him denying the assault, please provide it.  If he simply has no knowledge of the events, I don't see how that introduces serious doubt that the event did occur.  It additionally puts an inconsistency in Smyth's claims, that he both does and does not have knowledge of the events in question.)

If the article and Smyth's statement are any indication, you seem to be seeing what you want to believe rather than what's actually there.

You seem to be a moron, or more likely purposely obfuscating. Testimony that the party at which the assault allegedly took place didn't occur, is testimony that the assault itself didn't occur.

Smyth's statement that he has no knowledge of the party is not saying that the party didn't occur. That doesn't follow. And since his statement is not evidence that the party didn't occur, we're left with two people who deny that a vaguely referenced party didn't occur. But since you haven't linked to their statement's, I can't assume that you're not misrepresenting them the same way you have Smyth. Who are these other two witnesses, can you at least tell me that much?

So not including the other two whom you haven't cited, we have a person who might have committed sexual assault and a person who might have witnessed a sexual assault and didn't report it and who also is a good friend of Kavanaugh's as witnesses. Is that correct?

---

Apparently, if I'm reading this correctly, there are six witnesses, some of whom claim that they can confirm that Kavanaugh knew of the sexual harassment going on with Kozinski, despite his denials. Ostensibly both Grassley and Feinstein did not feel their testimony relevant to the hearings. (link)