Mostly bizarre.

[Little Rik]

One more fool that doesn't know that hypothesis are not evidence has spoken.  

And what about the point that ..........when the brain ceases to function, consciousness can no longer exist...........

Let me correct your writing Boru.
You should rather say..............when the brain ceases to function, consciousness can no longer stay inside the brain.........



Why the consciousness should stay one minute more inside a dead brain?
Would you stay inside the wreck of your car one minute more?

For God's sake Boru.
Can't you think properly before you come down with this sort of garbage?  

Clearly, you missed (or - what is more likely - ignored) this bit:

'Thousands of experiments confirm the hypothesis that neurochemical processes produce subjective experiences.'

An experiment which confirms an hypothesis qualifies as evidence.  What there is NO evidence for is the loopy idea that consciousness proceeds (or persists, if you like) without neurochemical processes.  Neurochemical processes have never, ever, not once, been observed to occur in a dead brain.

You're an idiot.

Boru

FOOL.  

Why there should be neurochemical processes once the consciousness has left the brain?
Do you expect a wreck of a vehicle with no driver to show any activity?

Once again you show that you know nothing about the relation between consciousness and brain-body.

Go back to school boy.