How circular?
What I am saying is that I think beauty is a subset of magnificence so is always magnificent. But it is different enough so it is different from the REST of the spectrum of magnificence which couldn't really described as beautiful because when you think of 'magnificence' you think of DIFFERENT to simply 'beauty' but I myself think beauty is a subset of magnificence so is always magnificent.
Hard to explain...but does that make sense to you? It does to me anyway.
EvF
What I am saying is that I think beauty is a subset of magnificence so is always magnificent. But it is different enough so it is different from the REST of the spectrum of magnificence which couldn't really described as beautiful because when you think of 'magnificence' you think of DIFFERENT to simply 'beauty' but I myself think beauty is a subset of magnificence so is always magnificent.
Hard to explain...but does that make sense to you? It does to me anyway.
EvF