(September 24, 2018 at 9:19 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:(September 23, 2018 at 12:52 pm)alpha male Wrote: Er, OK, she said there was a party with 4 other people, and none of the other 4 have any recollection of such a party. Happy now? It doesn't change anything.
I figured you guys would cut hairs rather than let it go. You didn't disappoint.
The other people CLAIM to have no recollection of the party. An investigation might uphold those claims. Or not.
(September 23, 2018 at 4:10 pm)alpha male Wrote: Maybe they will, but it seems unnecessary. Exactly what questions would you have the committee ask about a party that they weren't at?
How about where were you? Who was with you?
They can't ask those, as Ford doesn't know when or where the assault allegedly occurred.
Quote:Did you know Ford? Kavanaugh? Judge? Smyth?
OK. These would at best help Kavanaugh.
Quote:Why do you think Ford would claim you were at a party that you did not attend? Did you ever go to any parties with any of these people?
Their opinions on why she might make that claim are irrelevant. They're not psychology expert witnesses.
Quote:But I have a brilliant investigative mind, and know what questions to ask.
No, you don't.
