(September 25, 2018 at 12:38 pm)Aroura Wrote: I find the number of "Christian" men in this thread defending an accused (by at least 3 people at this point) sexual assaulter to be highly depressing, but utterly unsurprising. I don't know why I keep looking back in here, to see people who would apparently tell their own wife of daughter, hey hon, that was 35 years ago. Are you sure it happened? Why didn't you come forward before? And even if it did, you were just kids! He's been a great guy since then. Let it go. (and maybe you are lying just to get some fame and glory or to bring down a righteous man, you attention seeking whore).
Gotta get outa this before it starts sounding like A Handmaids Tale is a little too plausible.
This seems to be an example of what I find disturbing about all this. That it can't be talked about, and can't be questioned, without the accusations you made here. That everyone is just to assume that judge Kavenaugh is guilty and if they don't, they must be attacked also. I'm not saying any of what you asserted here.
And your emotional plea about a wife or daughter, could also be made about a son or husband. Would you wish for their life to be ruined, because of an accusation with little more than one persons word, and no other corroborating evidence. Everyone else who could attest to this, as denied knowledge of the party all together, or denied the claim outright. Those around him, say that the judge has always treated women with dignity and respect. And the second claim is quite spotty, with even the woman claiming it, not being certain if it was Kavenaugh. And this from a group which largely says that testimony is not even evidence.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther