(September 28, 2018 at 9:46 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Absence of evidence is only evidence of absence in certain circumstances. Absence of strong evidence for Bigfoot doesn't mean Bigfoot doesn't exist, it means that it's unreasonable to conclude that Bigfoot exists (i.e. is guilty of existing). Absence of evidence against Kavanaugh doesn't mean he's innocent of the allegation; it means that it's unreasonable to conclude that he's not innocent of the allegation.
And yet that's what the Dems have already done. Why would an investigation which brings us to the point we're already at change anything?