(September 28, 2018 at 9:28 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(September 28, 2018 at 8:34 pm)Cathooloo Wrote: Even if he didn't do it - and I think he did - his penchant for evasive, deceptive answer and his temperament make him utterly unsuitable to fill any judgeship, much less on SCOTUS.
I'm -thrilled- there's going to be an investigation but it may matter little.
At least until the election.
On the contrary, IF he is innocent (big if), I can understand why he is angry. Could you imagine being wrongfully accused, in front of the whole world, of sexually assaulting women? Not only does that ruin your career, but your family and your name. Over something you never did. If he is innocent, I dont blame him for acting angry. I think any human would, under those circumstances.
IF.
I find that possibility unlikely in the extreme.