(September 29, 2018 at 5:06 am)vulcanlogician Wrote:(September 28, 2018 at 9:28 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: On the contrary, IF he is innocent (big if), I can understand why he is angry. Could you imagine being wrongfully accused, in front of the whole world, of sexually assaulting women? Not only does that ruin your career, but your family and your name. Over something you never did. If he is innocent, I dont blame him for acting angry. I think any human would, under those circumstances.
I kudosed your post cuz I was glad to see you back on the forum! I kinda disagree w/ your position but whatevs...
In case there is any misunderstanding, my position is not that he is innocent. The response above was to CD saying that even IF he is innocent, he isn't fit to be judge because he was angry during the hearing.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
