(September 29, 2018 at 11:10 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(September 29, 2018 at 9:51 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: And you have the testimony from a number of others, that say they have no recollection of this party. The testimony from Kavenaugh and Judge, that this did not occur. And the testimony of her good friend, who was supposedly there (as well as a number of other parties with Ford), but denies having ever known Judge and Kavenaugh or remembering the party described. There is zero corroborating evidence. It seems that this is based on more emotion and I see people pointing to the ends, rather than the means. I'm starting to suspect that this is the case in a number of arguments here (hence the inconsistencies I see in many) It's less about reason and evidence, and more about emotion and the desired result.
You imagine a lot, and often the what is in your head doesn't match up with reality. I don't think that the question "did you cry; when old yeller died" should be a qualifier for the supreme court process. Your just making stuff up now.
I was being glib.
I mean that for Alpha and RR, sorry.
I don't see how anyone could look at both and claim he was more credible than she was.
