(October 3, 2018 at 4:11 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(October 3, 2018 at 3:19 pm)Aroura Wrote: Did you read it? I don't understand the defense in this article.
The defense is this. Before the New Yorker article, he knew nothing other than she was going to bring up some kind of allegations and preemptively reached out to some friends who might have been involved. Only after the New Yorker article did he know the specific allegation being claimed. So there was no conflict in his statements and as such he did not perjure himself, reports to the contrary.
(BTW - it is really rich to dismiss reporting based solely on its source...and then quoting Vox! In this day and age we must consider all sources biased.)
I think that when your have to rely on gossip about a teenage boy's yearbook comments from 30+ years ago, you are scraping the bottom of the barrel. What's next, complaints that he bit someone in pre-school?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
