Meh. Hitting kids is lazy and lacks creativity. That being said, this is what I got after saying criminals are legally protected from hitting and children are not "Would you suggest we give our kids 50 to life? A criminal is not a 2 year old. They are generally old enough to know better but choose to rape, murder and steal. Children call each other names, run into the street after their toys, and may give a parent a hard time about homework. Which one of those negative behaviors would warrant corporal punishment depends on the mitigating circumstances. If you honestly believe that criminals do not get beaten behind bars for raping, murdering and stealing demonstrates how naive you are. And making it ILLEGAL for a parent to choose corporal punishment is most certainly judgmental. If you don't want your child paddled cool. But you have no right taking that away from me if that is what I choose. Fair enough?"
So I guess because kids don't know better, you should hit them. Oh, and 50 to life is the only jail sentence ever. And . . . you can't take away a person's right to paddle their kids. I think the paddle part pisses me off the most. I forgot there is no difference between a legal and illegal beating in jail, either.
So I guess because kids don't know better, you should hit them. Oh, and 50 to life is the only jail sentence ever. And . . . you can't take away a person's right to paddle their kids. I think the paddle part pisses me off the most. I forgot there is no difference between a legal and illegal beating in jail, either.
