Well there either is evidence or there isn't. If there is then your belief isn't faith and it's rational. If there isn't then it IS faith and is also irrational (because it's irrational to believe in something without evidence).
You say you have faith that the evidence exists. But using the definition we are using here that means: You have belief without evidence that the evidence exists...well - you believe that the evidence exists...I wouldn't say that's belief without evidence in evidence...that's nonsensical - you don't need evidence for evidence itself!
TRUST in evidence maybe...BELIEF in it....but not FAITH in it! Belief without evidence in evidence is nonsensical because if you believe in evidence then you cannot have belief without evidence IN it because you DO believe in evidence lol...
Seems like a void there lol.
Oh? And YOU being picky? I don't mind lol! I kind of need a taste of my own medicine LOL.
EvF
You say you have faith that the evidence exists. But using the definition we are using here that means: You have belief without evidence that the evidence exists...well - you believe that the evidence exists...I wouldn't say that's belief without evidence in evidence...that's nonsensical - you don't need evidence for evidence itself!
TRUST in evidence maybe...BELIEF in it....but not FAITH in it! Belief without evidence in evidence is nonsensical because if you believe in evidence then you cannot have belief without evidence IN it because you DO believe in evidence lol...
Seems like a void there lol.
Oh? And YOU being picky? I don't mind lol! I kind of need a taste of my own medicine LOL.
EvF
