(September 29, 2018 at 3:26 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Ignosticism is a rhetorical device. Just because different people believe in different types of gods, with different attributes, doesn't mean that the term doesn't sensibly and recognizably signify.
I disagree with Khem here. I find ignosticism incredibly appealing as an epistemological position. To me, it says: "I will not believe in something that has not been clearly defined."
I'd like to hear from the ignostics, though. Is ignosticism merely a rhetorical device to you?
I'm an agnostic. My position wasn't selected for its rhetorical prowess. Rather, it is a definite statement concerning my knowledge of God. But I wanna hear from ignostics on this. What say you?