(October 11, 2018 at 11:10 am)Grandizer Wrote:(October 11, 2018 at 11:06 am)SteveII Wrote: Off the top of my head: Plutarch is not attesting to the events he writes about. In his defense it was 400 years earlier.
So...that's actually 401 reasons.
But if you check the work, he refers to first-hand testimonies surrounding Alexander the Great's birth.
Exactly how the authors of the Gospels referred to others' testimonies of Jesus' birth.
LOL. So he refers to 400 year old documents we have never seen from people he never met. You got me!! Exactly the same as the NT.