(May 24, 2009 at 10:05 am)Darwinian Wrote:(May 24, 2009 at 8:47 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but that would mean a philosophical argument (and that alone) would be enough to call a belief in something rational ... if that is so then no it is not, IMO, sufficient.
Your wrong
Actually you're wrong ... well grammatically at least (it's "you're" lol)
(May 24, 2009 at 10:05 am)Darwinian Wrote: Well, you're right as well. Reason works better than evidence in the argument I was having with EvF about whether Rational Faith was an oxymoron or not.
He was saying belief without evidence was irrational and I was saying it wasn't and suggested that it would be better to say that belief without reason would be a better statement...
Belief without evidence (and especially in spite of the evidence) is irrational.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
