The Bible

[Stucky]

In case my post gets lost in the Sauce....

Daniel was not written when you claim it was written, and the predictions made therein that did not amount to "prophecy after the fact" failed to come to pass, gloriously, dramatically, irrefutably. I personally prefer my prophecies to be spoken before the fact, and it's a plus when they actually come true, as opposed to just being claimed to have come true. Historians do agree that the author9s0 knew their history, but not for the reasons you seem to believe. Historians believe they knew their history because the "prophecies" contained therein were written when the events actually were history.

Where are your citations to prove this? All I have is your word and I find that suspect. Don't bother posting an atheist website either because if you won't accept the Bible then I wont accept an atheist website.

---

But there's no point in my putting them here because anything I say is wrong.

Whatever you say is wrong regardless of where you put it. That is a fact derived from relying on a preposterous old collection of fairy tales, lad, and there isn't anything anyone can do to help you until you get your head out of your ass.

Sorry. But you are far from the first bible-thumping jackass to show up here and most of them were better at it than you.

Reported as abusive.