(October 31, 2018 at 3:22 am)CDF47 Wrote:(October 31, 2018 at 1:49 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: The plight of those suffering Africa and , truth be told other ravaged places in the world are a far more complicated fix than the simple ramblings here might address.
So, slalloming back into the topic, an intetesting question to the OP is in regards to the DNA and all the things it does not support by way of the OP's assertions.
Some of which have already been pointed out.
I.E.
Lack of evidence for drastic genetic bottle-necks.
That mitochondrial Eve is dated many thousands of years apart from the genes of the so called Adam.
That the myriad evidences for theory of evolution indicate a 'Deeper' amount of time than the OP allots.
The list goes on.
Strange, nay almost cherry picked, seem the OP's limited fixations
How do you determine a genetic bottle neck for the flood?
How accurate do you think mitochondrial Eve and Y Chromosome Adam genetic dates actually are? We are talking about ancestors of the human race that existed 50,000 - 450,000 years ago.
I believe in OEC and day-age interpretation which dates the universe as 13.8 billion years old and the Earth 4.54 billion years old.
I stand corrected on your view of the age of reality. *Bows*
As for "How do you determine a genetic bottle neck" ?
On the technical aspects I must deffer to other possible forum members more knowledgable than I.
My point is that human genetics do NOT show any sort of hall marks of a genetic bottle neck where the entire human genome was reducde to around a dozen people. A species that I understand to have suffered a serious genetic bottle neck is the African Cheeta. Reading how such a problem effects said animals should make for interesting reading.
By all counts (I think it was the forum member Mathilda?) who pointed out that for a populatiopn to continue to survive a minimum of about 10, 00 indiviuals have to survive and be able to then increase the population numbers.
Not at work.