(September 26, 2011 at 11:21 pm)lucent Wrote: You said we were done talking because you ran away from our debate in a cowardly fashion. Your claim was that the testimony of billions of people could be dismissed, so I produced that particular video because I feel the testimony in it is powerful and difficult to dismiss. I asked you to attempt to dismiss it, I never said it was irrefutable. You, performing rather poorly in the debate, decided to end it and use the excuse that my use of a video from the 700 club somehow proved I wasn't worthy of any further reply.OK, your thinking skills may be deficient but you have a colorful memory. You just keep on believing that. Keep watching Pat Robertson's 700 Club thinking you're getting news and information.
Quote:What it really proved was that you were grasping at straws, especially as it pertained to the hypocripsy of your beliefs about God, and cut and ran to escape further questioning.You bringing up my beliefs to justify yours (beyond the fact that there's a chasm of difference between a belief in a First Cause and a belief in the Bible, with all the baggage that comes with it but that's a lengthy discussion point I've explored in my Deism vs. Christianity thread) was a red herring and ad hominem tu quoque.
Quote:Most of the rest of this post is entirely fallacious. You asked why homosexual love is evil. I gave you an explanation and some reasoning as to why God considers it a sin.Exactly. I asked YOU why love is evil when the body parts are similar and you pulled out your Bible and hid behind your god.
Let me be blunt, so even a brainwashed moron like you might understand, I don't give a shit what your imaginary, spoiled, tantrum throwing, blood thirsty, egomaniacal god says. I'm asking you to THINK and EXPLAIN to me why same gender love is evil.
Try it. Explain something without hiding behind the Bible. It's called using your brain. Give it a shot.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist