RE: God: Misinterpreted as an extraterrestrial?
September 27, 2011 at 7:24 pm
(This post was last modified: September 27, 2011 at 7:36 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Actually, we do know that Genesis (especially if taken as an account of material creation) is incorrect. You believe that it is not. However, for this to be anything more than your own belief, you would have to provide evidence.
The density of mercury suggests that the bible is correct?
I thought I'd already heard the most ignorant thing I was going to hear today. 
I have heard of a global flood yes, I haven't seen any evidence of a global flood. Care to step up?
Apparently you do not. Again, you only believe that you know.
That makes three responses waffling around about evidence. You know exactly what is required, you know you don't have any, and this is why you keep pouting about "standards of evidence" instead of actually providing any.
Your premise and conclusion are both in dispute (as is most everything in between). As such, your god cannot be said to account for anything. Fix your arguments. If you do, then you'll have arguments, I'll still require evidence.
Hmn, 57 minutes long and the first thing I see when I start browsing is a defense of a global flood (doesn't bode well). Give me the cliff notes on the evidence presented here.
You're arguing for a trickster god. Loki is a trickster god.
I actually lost a little bit of my drink when this website loaded. You realize that all of these papers link to bullshit "creation journals" right? Let's see some science amigo. The first one I checked up on was actually Ken Ham's baby CMI/AIG. If you're going to link trash I'm going to stop spending time responding to you and just call bullshit until you, personally, make the case.
I suppose you and science will just have to agree to disagree on that count eh? Linking creation journals is strike one through three. You're claiming conspiracy here. Bullshit.
Another creation link. Why is it that the only people who seem to come to these conclusions are christians, largely apologists?
That makes four contortions around the word evidence. Way to end a post.
Your entire post consisted of "science cannot explain this", or "the current theory does not fit our observations", now, laying aside the fact that I don't actually trust for one minute that anything even approaching a factual assessment of our knowledge or theories on these matters is actually being offered......at what point would science being wrong about this or that automatically default to your god? When you're asked to show evidence for your claims of gods existence, or of the the bibles innerrancy, provide evidence of god's existence, or the bible's innerrancy. Don't waste a single keystroke providing evidence for why this or that piece of scientific evidence is wrong. We can't both be right, but we can both be wrong. You have to make your own case. It cannot be made by criticizing the theory of another. If any given comet, just to take one example from your linktrash, is not billions of years old, how, exactly, is that proof of anything that is written in the bible? There's a quick answer, it isn't. I'm going to have to side with Chuck here, you have absolutely no idea what science is, or how it is done.
The density of mercury suggests that the bible is correct?
I thought I'd already heard the most ignorant thing I was going to hear today. I have heard of a global flood yes, I haven't seen any evidence of a global flood. Care to step up?
Apparently you do not. Again, you only believe that you know.
That makes three responses waffling around about evidence. You know exactly what is required, you know you don't have any, and this is why you keep pouting about "standards of evidence" instead of actually providing any.
Your premise and conclusion are both in dispute (as is most everything in between). As such, your god cannot be said to account for anything. Fix your arguments. If you do, then you'll have arguments, I'll still require evidence.
Hmn, 57 minutes long and the first thing I see when I start browsing is a defense of a global flood (doesn't bode well). Give me the cliff notes on the evidence presented here.
You're arguing for a trickster god. Loki is a trickster god.
I actually lost a little bit of my drink when this website loaded. You realize that all of these papers link to bullshit "creation journals" right? Let's see some science amigo. The first one I checked up on was actually Ken Ham's baby CMI/AIG. If you're going to link trash I'm going to stop spending time responding to you and just call bullshit until you, personally, make the case.
I suppose you and science will just have to agree to disagree on that count eh? Linking creation journals is strike one through three. You're claiming conspiracy here. Bullshit.
Another creation link.
Why is it that the only people who seem to come to these conclusions are christians, largely apologists?That makes four contortions around the word evidence. Way to end a post.
Your entire post consisted of "science cannot explain this", or "the current theory does not fit our observations", now, laying aside the fact that I don't actually trust for one minute that anything even approaching a factual assessment of our knowledge or theories on these matters is actually being offered......at what point would science being wrong about this or that automatically default to your god? When you're asked to show evidence for your claims of gods existence, or of the the bibles innerrancy, provide evidence of god's existence, or the bible's innerrancy. Don't waste a single keystroke providing evidence for why this or that piece of scientific evidence is wrong. We can't both be right, but we can both be wrong. You have to make your own case. It cannot be made by criticizing the theory of another. If any given comet, just to take one example from your linktrash, is not billions of years old, how, exactly, is that proof of anything that is written in the bible? There's a quick answer, it isn't. I'm going to have to side with Chuck here, you have absolutely no idea what science is, or how it is done.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
