(November 16, 2018 at 1:26 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Dear Everena,
The argument species can't change to other species, is weak at best and proven false at worst, but a better way to prove naturalism evolution didn't take place is to show irreducible complexity in life and design as a system. Not a particular thing that can't have evolved, but over all a structure, that has many different types of it existing, but is irreducible complex by design in an abstract way. This is true of consciousness for example and it's true of other things in nature which I will not mention which because then a whole argument will ensure on exactly those things, when people don't even understand the nature of the irreducible complexity problem with respect to small changes over time and big changes over large periods of time, and the impossibility of things that are binary or irreducible complex in nature.
Something being what you call 'binary' doesn't show that the item or feature is irreducibly complex. This is as true of consciousness as it is of anything else. This has already been drawn to your attention, yet you persist in this nonsense, likely because you have little actual grasp of what irreducible complexity actually means. Anyway, as usual, you're simply wrong. Consciousness is not irreducibly complex. I don't know what other things you might have in mind, but I suspect you are wrong about those things as well, quite possibly for the same reason.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)