Oh man... you got to see some degree of the book and understand key aspects of it, before we can discuss whether it's claims are true or not. I haven't claimed to prove anything of it.
But you are going to have to let me bring about it's wonders. It's like a building, you have to build with blocks. But the blocks have to be understood. So you put the in the building. But at the same time, the blocks in themselves mean nothing in themselves, you just go to understand a bit here and there, and keep building.
I relate with programming in this regard. You make functions and you have to modify them later. But you have to build somewhat dynamically, and waterfall approach doesn't work with regards to most programs and applications.
But you are going to have to let me bring about it's wonders. It's like a building, you have to build with blocks. But the blocks have to be understood. So you put the in the building. But at the same time, the blocks in themselves mean nothing in themselves, you just go to understand a bit here and there, and keep building.
I relate with programming in this regard. You make functions and you have to modify them later. But you have to build somewhat dynamically, and waterfall approach doesn't work with regards to most programs and applications.
