RE: origins...
December 1, 2018 at 9:11 am
(This post was last modified: December 1, 2018 at 9:14 am by Brian37.)
(December 1, 2018 at 8:37 am)wyzas Wrote:(December 1, 2018 at 8:28 am)Brian37 Wrote: Coded language hiding behind a "discussion" in order to falsely play victim.
He wants to claim some here are "discomfort" when what we are doing is merely rejecting bad claims.
He wants to use "deflecting" and falsely accuse us of using our sarcasm trying to paint us as in denial.
Brian, you're just too easy. Think about it.
Think about what?
Not my problem theists don't want to consider that old mythology is just that.
I am not uncomfortable in saying that, nor is it deflecting. I don't have a problem saying "That was then, this is now." It was understandable people wrote claims and sold claims without benefit of modern knowledge. But we have far better data now.
If others want to wade down an old Yellow Brick Road, not going to stop them. But this OP merely was HIS way of ignoring his own cognitive dissonance and his own discomfort in refusing to consider he got it wrong.
