Science is inherently atheistic

[Angrboda]

I'm still waiting for clarity on just what the OP is claiming here. If it's that one needs to assume that no god exists to do good science, then it's patently false. If it's that science cannot consider the hypothesis that God or some other associated thing cannot be scientifically investigated, then that too is false. (The simple counter-example is intercessory prayer. Science does not have to establish a mechanism for an effect to establish that an effect exists, so that supernatural causes cannot be demonstrated to be causes does not imply that supernatural effects are therefore not scientific and not real effects.)